Abstract Detail



Development and Structure

Madrigal, Yesenia [1], Scanlon, Michael [2], Alzate, Juan F [3], Pabon Mora, Natalia [4].

Key players in the reproductive transition in neotropical orchids: a departure from model monocots.

During the reproductive transition in angiosperms, flowering integrators set the timing of meristem fate shifts, when a vegetative apical meristem (SAM) forming leaves, becomes an inflorescence meristem (IM) that forms bracts and flowers. This process has been well studied in model grasses, like Oryza sativa and includes flowering promoters like Heading date 3a (Hd3a) (FLOWERING LOCUS T-FT), Heading date 1 (Hd1) (CONSTANS-CO), FLOWERING LOCUS D (OsFD1) and 14–3–3 proteins that activate floral meristem identity genes. Repressors involved in the maintenance of the vegetative phases include TERMINAL FLOWER LOCUS 1 (TFL1) and OsMADS55 (AGL24/SVP). Additional repressors have been identified in vernalization responsive grasses like wheat, specifically FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) and VERNALIZATION 2 (VRN2). Here we studied the morpho-anatomical and molecular basis of the flowering transition in the Orchidaceae, one of the most diverse angiosperm lineages (ca. 29,000 species) with outstanding habit variations and niche adaptations. We combine RNA-seq analyses targeting differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between SAM and IM with targeted evaluation of spatio-temporal expression patterns of major regulators in Epidendrum fimbriatum, a miniature terrestrial orchid with nearly constant flowering in the field. We found 40 DEGs between SAM and IM involved in reproductive transition that let us to re-evaluate the Flowering Genetic Regulatory Network (FGRN) in orchids when compared to the model species O. sativa. We found that: 1) flowering integrators are present in multiple copies in orchids but only few of them are transcriptionally active and 2) the canonical flowering integrators are maintained, but due to copy number variation functional changes seem plausible. For instance, PEBP gene expression patterns suggest sub-functionalization with TFL1 expressed in the SAM, FT1C in leaves, and FT2A in the IM. Similarly, SVP genes, have also specialized, as SVP2A is expressed in both the SAM and IM, but SVP2B is restricted to the IM and SVP1 restricted to the SAM. Conversely, FD, FUL-like, LFY and SOC1 genes show broad expression during vegetative and reproductive stages, suggesting they may act redundantly. Our comprehensive analysis of the orchid FGRN point to a modified set of flowering integrators in the reproductive transition, with FT2 and FUL-like genes as major promoters and SVP1 and SVP2A homologs as key repressors in the absence of FLC, deviating from model monocot FGRNs.


1 - University Of Antioquia, Biology, 67 Street 53 - 108, Medellín, ANT, 050010, Colombia
2 - Cornell University, School of Integrative Plant Science, 236 Tower Rd Plant Science building, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA
3 - University of Antioquia, Centro Nacional de Secuenciación Genómica, 62 street 52-59, Medellin, ANT, 050010, Colombia
4 - Universidad De Antioquia, Ciudad Universitaria, Aa1226, Medellin, ANT, 050010, Colombia

Keywords:
flowering
Orchidaceae
Evo-Devo
Gene evolution
gene expression
Meristem development
Gene Regulatory Netvwork
Reproductive transition.

Presentation Type: Oral Paper
Number: DS1005
Abstract ID:487
Candidate for Awards:Katherine Esau Award,Maynard F. Moseley Award,Developmental and Structural Section Graduate Student Registration Award


Copyright © 2000-2022, Botanical Society of America. All rights reserved